Hello everyone. Welcome to a new week.

The Silicon Valley Bank saga deserves its own daily update. Accordingly, we will dedicate today’s discussion to the topic. While we will quickly go over what happened, the broader points will deal with Apple.

Silicon Valley Bank Collapses

Last week, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), known for its long-term relationships with tech VCs and start-ups, imploded. The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) took over the bank on Friday.

Yesterday, the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC announced various actions to avoid financial contagion.

“Today we are taking decisive actions to protect the U.S. economy by strengthening public confidence in our banking system. This step will ensure that the U.S. banking system continues to perform its vital roles of protecting deposits and providing access to credit to households and businesses in a manner that promotes strong and sustainable economic growth.

After receiving a recommendation from the boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, and consulting with the President, Secretary Yellen approved actions enabling the FDIC to complete its resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, in a manner that fully protects all depositors. Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer.

We are also announcing a similar systemic risk exception for Signature Bank, New York, New York, which was closed today by its state chartering authority. All depositors of this institution will be made whole. As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer.

Shareholders and certain unsecured debtholders will not be protected. Senior management has also been removed. Any losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund to support uninsured depositors will be recovered by a special assessment on banks, as required by law.

Finally, the Federal Reserve Board on Sunday announced it will make available additional funding to eligible depository institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors."

Unfortunately, the term “bailout” has become a subjective one. What the U.S. government is doing with SVB, Signature, and the entire banking sector for that matter, is a far cry from the drastic steps taken during the subprime mortgage crisis of the late 2000s. With that said, there are questions that politicians

An Above Avalon membership is required to continue reading this update. Members can read the full update here. An audio version of this update is available to members who have the podcast add-on attached to their membership. More information about the podcast add-on is found here.

(Members: Daily Updates are always accessible by logging into Slack. If you haven’t logged into Slack before, fill out this form to receive an invite.)

Above Avalon Membership

Subscribe $20/month

Subscribe $200/year

Payment is processed and secured by Stripe. Apple Pay and other mobile payment options are accepted. Special Inside Orchard bundle pricing is available for Above Avalon members.

More information about Above Avalon membership, including the full list of benefits and privileges, is available here.

Two weeks ago, Apple reported a solid FY3Q22 (April to June) given the tough year-over-year compare and considerable FX headwind. In terms of good news, supply chain issues, component shortages, and COVID-related headwinds appear to have bottomed for Apple. When it comes to bad news, some parts of Apple’s business are getting hit by inflation and slowing economic growth more than others.

Here are Apple’s reported 3Q22 results versus my expectations with brief commentary for each item.

Revenue: $83.0 (vs. my $85.9B estimate). Results missed my estimate due to a larger than expected headwind from FX, a larger than expected supply shortage with Mac, and macro issues impacting Wearables, Home, and Accessories.
EPS: $1.20 (vs. my $1.25).
iPhone revenue: $40.7B (vs. my $39.9B). That’s a good iPhone revenue number that doesn’t raise any yellow or red flags to me.
Services revenue: $19.6B (vs. my $20.1B). Results missed primarily on a larger than expected headwind from FX.
Wearables / Home / Accessories revenue: $8.1B (vs. my $9.4B). This was a weak number which Apple attributed to a “cocktail of headwinds.”
Mac revenue: $7.4B (vs. my $8.9B). Apple experienced major issues with supply as the Mac was the product category impacted the most by COVID lockdowns closing factories in China.
iPad revenue: $7.2B (vs. my $7.6B). Apple experienced ongoing issues with iPad supply.
Overall gross margin: 43.3% (vs. my 43.3%)
Services gross margin: 71.5% (vs. my 72.0%)
Products (HW) gross margin: 34.5% (vs. my 34.5%)

Breaking down the $2.9B revenue miss to my estimate, there were two primary drivers:

$1.5B revenue miss due to Mac supply not being as good as thought.
$1.3B revenue miss due to weaker Wearables, Home, and Accessories.

Even though Apple missed my (elevated) expectations, the company reported a 3Q22 beat to consensus as revenue came in about $2B stronger than sell-side analysts were expecting. The beat was due to stronger iPhone revenue as most analysts were expecting something more like $36B to $38B of iPhone revenue (vs. the $40.7B reported figure). EPS came in $0.04 above consensus as Apple’s margins came in slightly better than consensus thought as well.

An Above Avalon membership is required to continue reading this article. Members can read the full article here.

The full article includes the following sections:

Apple’s 3Q22: The Key Numbers
iPhone Sales Resiliency
Apple Ecosystem Growth Slows
Reading Between the Lines of Apple’s 3Q22 Earnings Q&A With Analysts
Notes From Apple’s 3Q22 10-Q
Tracking Apple’s Paid Subscriptions
Apple's Share Buyback Update
My Revised Apple Financial Estimates

An audio version of the article is available to members who have the podcast add-on attached to their membership. More information about the add-on is found here.